Page 1 of 1

TDJ Rome vs. Ethereal 77

Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 8:03 pm
by theonehorst
I just bought the TDJ Rome vs. Ethereal 77 from http://www.cybersounds.org. Some great songs. Do you know if there are more releases from the grand liftarz era?

Re: TDJ Rome vs. Ethereal 77

Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 8:56 pm
by rattymouse
theonehorst wrote:I just bought the TDJ Rome vs. Ethereal 77 from http://www.cybersounds.org. Some great songs. Do you know if there are more releases from the grand liftarz era?
What the heck does a Ground Liftarz CD sound like?

Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 9:01 pm
by epsilon75
Up Tempo :arrow:

Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 9:01 pm
by theonehorst
Sorry I meant: Ground Liftaz, the old label from Jerome. He did some stuff under the name TDJ Rome.

Posted: Tue May 08, 2007 9:33 pm
by 24db
theonehorst wrote:Sorry I meant: Ground Liftaz, the old label from Jerome. He did some stuff under the name TDJ Rome.
from memory that CD had most of Jerome's GF tracks, some of the other cuts were used on DM3 (as limited editiion 12"s, and DJ versions). He also did one white vinyl 12" but those tracks are on that compilation I think. Personally I think Ulrich's stuff on that disc is much better

Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 7:27 pm
by Chris Monk
24db wrote:Personally I think Ulrich's stuff on that disc is much better
I'd go along with that. Neptunes is a much better representation of Jerome's work.

Posted: Wed May 09, 2007 7:38 pm
by 24db
Chris Monk wrote:
24db wrote:Personally I think Ulrich's stuff on that disc is much better
I'd go along with that. Neptunes is a much better representation of Jerome's work.
Brilliant album...not bad live either! ;)

Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 5:26 pm
by Pertou
Chris Monk wrote:
24db wrote:Personally I think Ulrich's stuff on that disc is much better
I'd go along with that. Neptunes is a much better representation of Jerome's work.
I find the TDJ ROME stuff quite immature, so I must agree on that one.

Posted: Thu May 10, 2007 8:43 pm
by 24db
Pertou wrote:
Chris Monk wrote:
24db wrote:Personally I think Ulrich's stuff on that disc is much better
I'd go along with that. Neptunes is a much better representation of Jerome's work.
I find the TDJ ROME stuff quite immature, so I must agree on that one.
well I think most musicians produce stuff that makes them cringe later in life...in fact Jerome is one of the few musicians I know that actually said on record that there's a few tunes he wrote that shouldn't have seen the light of day. That's honesty for you!

Posted: Fri May 11, 2007 12:02 am
by Chris Monk
24db wrote:
Pertou wrote:
Chris Monk wrote: I'd go along with that. Neptunes is a much better representation of Jerome's work.
I find the TDJ ROME stuff quite immature, so I must agree on that one.
well I think most musicians produce stuff that makes them cringe later in life...in fact Jerome is one of the few musicians I know that actually said on record that there's a few tunes he wrote that shouldn't have seen the light of day. That's honesty for you!
Had to dig it out and give it another spin tonight and it's pretty much as I remember it. Not sure what Jerome was going for, possibly some sort of club-disco type thing, not my sort of thing at all. Mind you there are occasional flashes of brilliance but too few to make it an essential release IMO.

Ulrich's stuff is pretty good though....

Posted: Tue May 31, 2011 2:41 am
by Erik
it's just DnB. i think it's fine work :)

Posted: Thu Jun 02, 2011 11:54 am
by cantosis
Erik wrote:it's just DnB. i think it's fine work :)

yup I agree with that. I pretty much like everything Jerome has done in his solo work