Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 9:04 pm
I wasn't going to bother with DM1.2 but as I had nothing better to spend me money on I did. A good mix and the tracks are IMO very different from the originals. Nice touch too with the red CD.
Page 9 of 10
Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 10:41 pm
Can't say that DM 2.1 impressed me much, DM4.2 sounds a much more interesting prospect
Posted: Mon Aug 06, 2007 11:23 pm
I can't get too excited about this one, I'm afraid. More to come as well!24db wrote:Can't say that DM 2.1 impressed me much, DM4.2 sounds a much more interesting prospect
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 7:47 am
Nice to see a post form you Mick, hope alls well.Hobo wrote:I can't get too excited about this one, I'm afraid. More to come as well!24db wrote:Can't say that DM 2.1 impressed me much, DM4.2 sounds a much more interesting prospect
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 8:43 am
timer wrote:Nice to see a post form you Mick, hope alls well.Hobo wrote:I can't get too excited about this one, I'm afraid. More to come as well!24db wrote:Can't say that DM 2.1 impressed me much, DM4.2 sounds a much more interesting prospect
Good thanks Tim. How's things with Timer and Dolphin Dance?
Posted: Tue Aug 07, 2007 6:56 pm
Good thanks Mick.Hobo wrote:timer wrote:Nice to see a post form you Mick, hope alls well.Hobo wrote: I can't get too excited about this one, I'm afraid. More to come as well!
Good thanks Tim. How's things with Timer and Dolphin Dance?
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2007 1:40 am
Very different? I'm too lazy to compare all tracks. Could you, mention one track which is clearly reworked?sparrow wrote:I wasn't going to bother with DM1.2 but as I had nothing better to spend me money on I did. A good mix and the tracks are IMO very different from the originals. Nice touch too with the red CD.
Good compilation, with a little too much weight laid on DM2, I think.
Fine bonus tracks. I look forward to DM 4.2. (Shouldn't it be 4.3 ?)
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2007 5:57 pm
what I can hear the changes are very minor. Nice sound quality though
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2007 6:57 pm
I have to admit that the sound quality is excellent24db wrote:what I can hear the changes are very minor. Nice sound quality though
Posted: Sat Aug 11, 2007 9:20 pm
epsilon75 wrote:I have to admit that the sound quality is excellent24db wrote:what I can hear the changes are very minor. Nice sound quality though
The Tracks are all rerecorded I'm sure. They all sound a helluva lot different from the originals IMO.TANGEROME DREAM
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2007 9:46 pm
Re-recorded or not, I do not feel ripped-off by this releases. I think it's good purchase. I'm definitely a fan of Jerome Froese.
Re: TANGEROME DREAM
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2007 10:02 pm
Like i said i was very dubious of buying this but i need not have been,its a very fresh sound and im glad i got itPertou wrote:Re-recorded or not, I do not feel ripped-off by this releases. I think it's good purchase. I'm definitely a fan of Jerome Froese.
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2007 10:03 pm
Is the unreleased track, Paranormal Skills, credited to just Jerome or Jerome/Edgar?
And is it any good? (Is it Dream Mixy?)
Thanks.
And is it any good? (Is it Dream Mixy?)
Thanks.
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2007 10:07 pm
1. Just JeromeBeaubourg wrote:1. Is the unreleased track, Paranormal Skills, credited to just Jerome or Edgar/Jerome?
2. And is it any good? (Is it Dream Mixy?)
3. Thanks.
2. Quite Dream Mixy, yes. That's what I would consider good
3. no, thank YOU!
Posted: Sun Aug 12, 2007 10:09 pm
most, if not every DM disc was by Jerome, therefore it can only be Jerome
Very talented guy, but I'm dying of boredom waiting for his new album and the answers to the questions he promissed
Very talented guy, but I'm dying of boredom waiting for his new album and the answers to the questions he promissed